The Treasury Department has been working on redesigning its federal spending data website? is eager to get public input on how well it’s doing.

This week, the Treasury Department called for comments and ideas from the public on how to improve The comments are to be shared via a new website,, and will be used to guide needed improvements to, expected to be complete by 2017.

“For eight years, has been a resource for the public to find this kind of data,” David Lebryk, fiscal assistant secretary at the Treasury Department, wrote in a blog. “We want to make this website better than ever.”

The call for comments on follows a roundtable hosted Nov. 10 by the Treasury Department and the Center for Open Data Enterprise, exploring ways to increase public access and use of federal spending data.

The meeting and the open beta website are part of the Treasury Department’s efforts to implement the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014, known as the DATA Act.

“The new provides a unique opportunity for the public to review, test, and provide feedback on data display and search functionality components that will inform Treasury’s efforts to support the needs of data users,” according to Lebryk, who added that the Treasury Department will add new features and functionalities for the public to review on a rolling basis.

According to, the website provides prime recipient transaction data reported by any federal agency that issues contracts, grants, loans, and other financial assistance awards.

The Treasury Department began updating the site in March, and as of September reported having made improvements and additions that included:

•    Federal funding recipient profiles;

•    A list of the largest awardees;

•    An overview of awards by fiscal year;

•    Keyword search capability;

•    Advanced data search capability;

•    Improvements to data downloading performance; and

•    Regular updates to keep data most current.

The Project on Government Oversight (POGO), a nonpartisan independent government watchdog, said falls short in a number of ways. POGO argued in 2013 that the site lacks enough data on local spending and that data reported on the site does not always match the data reported by the federal agencies and programs using the funds.

A 2014 report by the General Accountability Office found that federal guidance on what data should be reported is sometimes unclear.

Below is a graphic found on the open beta website.



Diana Manos is a MeriTalk contributing writer.

Read More About
More Topics
Diana Manos